The irony in MOE’s good intentions
“If your child shows leadership and excels in non-academic areas, he is eligible for the Edusave Award for Achievement, Good Leadership and Service. The award is given based on his achievement in co-curricular activities and contribution to community services over a one-year period.” – Ministry of Education (MOE) website.
My Paper reported:
“The award will range from $200 to $500, depending on the student’s level of education. It will benefit up to 10,000 Singaporean students from early next year.
‘As we place more emphasis on holistic education and character development”, it is time for us to realign “our recognition framework,’ said Mr Heng [Swee Keat, Minister for Education].
Virtues such as resilience, tenacity, integrity, care and respect are among the values he highlighted during the debate.”
The award has been criticised in some areas for eroding the very values which the ministry is trying to inculcate in our students. The gripe perhaps, in particular, centers on presenting monetary rewards to students who show “care and concern” for others. In short, critics say this is perverting these values themselves.
There is some truth to what the critics say, and it is puzzling why the ministry sees a need to introduce such changes to the award scheme which has been for academic achievements until now.
A similar scheme was introduced some years ago for NSmen and reservists who did well in the Individual Physical Proficiency Test (IPPT). Depending on how an NSman performs, his reward is between S$100 and S$400. Undoubtedly, the scheme – as it is with the Edusave Award – was designed to encourage our soldiers to do better in physical fitness. But one would ask why they should be rewarded for something which all soldiers, anywhere in the world, is expected to be – physically fit.
In the same way, why are we dishing out monetary incentives to students for doing things which they should be doing – caring for others?
When a student realises that his charitable behaviour is “monetisable”, it is a thinking which he will carry into other areas of his life – at home, with friends, at work, in his community and in the larger society. In short, he – and the others who may receive the award each year – will set the stage for the tone of our nation in future, more so if these are top students or “future leaders”.
Next time a parent asks his or her child to do something which the child is supposed to do anyway – such as homework, or to behave, or to be kind to his siblings or friends, for example – he will turn around and asks his parent what reward they are willing to give him! In fact, this is already happening.
Instead of giving out the cash to students, perhaps MOE could tweak the scheme such that the reward which would be paid to the student is donated to a charity of the student’s choice. This way, students are taught selflessness and charity. A “Wall of Recognition” or a “Wall of Compassion” can be set up in the school where the names of the students can be listed to recognise the students’ altruism. Alternatively, have the student present the cheque to representatives of the charity of his choice at the charity itself or at the school.
For the moment, the new scheme subverts the very values which the ministry is trying to inculcate. Indeed, it is ironic.
Find me on Facebook here: www.facebook.com/andrewlohhp
Comments – Dos & Don’ts
- Triple bypass
- Why is Election Department silent on pro-PAP Facebook page’s post on Polling Day?
- PEA allows “transmission of personal political views on the Internet” – or does it not?
- Your argument applies to the PAP as well, Dr Lee
- Why Murali can still be in Parliament – even if he loses in Bukit Batok
- Murali loses control of own campaign; distances himself from party leaders’ gutter politics
- Disgraceful, Grace Fu
- Murali’s unnecessary spending
- The HDB and the URA should clarify or rebut what Murali claims
- September 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- August 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- January 2015
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
Top Posts & Pages
- Triple bypass
- The 10-year old GEP boy who wants to be a gangster
- Govt's handling of recent cases erodes trust in public institutions
- "We are professionals" - and out you go
- A National Day song - in Tamil!
- Wei Ling vs Straits Times - the one unanswered question
- Boy's death - a police review of procedures not enough
- A little about me
- The frustration of Lawrence Wong, and others