Don’t dismiss the Government’s engagement effort

The way the Government engages the public has come under fire in recent times. The most prominent instances include the Bukit Brown cemetery issue, the building of proposed nursing homes in housing estates, and students at a pre-university forum. These have got Government critics huffing and puffing. “The so-called engagement is a wayang (a show) rather than a genuine empathetic engagement process,” they say.

However, it would be wrong to dismiss all the engagement that the Government has embarked on as nothing more than a “wayang”. There have been fruitful dialogue and exchanges, many of these not seen by the public. Some are, as in these examples: Law Minister K Shanmugam lending his voice to Acres; Minister of State Tan Chuan Jin on the culling of cats in housing estates; MCYS Minister Chan Chun Sing’s monthly forum and engaging bloggers about the Internet; MCYS MOS Halimah Yaacob’s constant dialogue with HOME; MOS Tan’s exchange with migrant aid group TWC2; Shanmugam engaging NGO Aware on the sexual assault legislation and declaring that the Government would abolish it; and most recently, the Government said it is reviewing the proposed nursing home in Bishan after feedback from residents.

These are just a few examples. There are many other instances of Government (ministers and MPs) engaging in dialogue with the public, even at individual levels, such as this one.

This is not to say that all the issues brought up are resolved or even considered. I do not know how these are dealt with. The individuals or groups involved in these exchanges would know better. Still, the point is that the Government is engaging more. There is no question about this.

And there have been hits and misses, as expected.

The problem is that some of the more high profile “misses” have taken the spotlight, and perhaps even blown out of proportion, such as the pre-university forum where DPM Teo Chee Hean had participated in. And this is then used to dismiss all of the Government’s effort, which I feel is unfair.

For the longest time, one of the main criticisms of the Government is that it was holed up in its “Ivory Tower” and does not “come down to the ground” to speak with the commoners, let alone engage them in dialogue and exchange. This has changed somewhat and those of us who have been privileged to be involved know that more is going on than the headlines and soundbites we see and hear.

So, I would be fair and see things in the broader sense – that there is more engagement going on (much of it behind the scenes) than what many see or know. And I am glad that the Government is doing this, after all the criticisms we have laid at its door for being out of touch and elitist.

Of course the criticisms will continue, and there will be further “misses” and failures. But that just means we have to continue to fine-tune the process (on both sides) and work towards something more genuine, concrete and workable. I do not think that it is only the Government which has a role in this. I feel we, the public, also has one to play – and that is to step up and be counted too, instead of just sitting back and criticising and pointing fingers.

A friend said to me just 2 days ago: “I wonder how many of those criticising Chan Chun Sing for not doing enough about the poor and elderly would actually help to do something about them. If they all contributed a little effort, perhaps these people whom they seem to care for would be in a better situation, even if it’s just a little.”

There is some merit in what my friend said. Everyone has a role to play, especially when we are also asking the Government not to be so involved in running our lives. If that is what we want, then we should step up and do things for ourselves and those around us whom we care for too.

But as far as the Government engaging the public is concerned, I give the Government credit for this. And I hope it will continue to do so, and not be discouraged or be dissuaded by the criticisms of the few. It is a work-in-progress, and we will have to ride the bumps along the way until we come to a comfortable equilibrium for all sides.

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Don’t dismiss the Government’s engagement effort

  1. The issue with any long standing government like the PAP is that once they have been in power for so long, any action taken by them is perceived by a cynical populace as further attempts to consolidate and stay in power. Even positive media exposure is imply seen as further evidence as such.

    Personally, I would not worry as the PAP is going to stay in power for at least another two terms (They will win 2016 and maybe scrape through 2021 even if the opposition perform strongly). As long as the 39.9% who voted against the PAP stay the significant minority, they have little to worry. The government only has to work to main status quo.

    The onus is on the opposition parties to come up with the goods (policies, groundwork and quality candidates) to convince the swing voters (those who voted for the PAP) to vote for them.

  2. I dont deny the sincerity of the current ruling party in wanting to reach out. They show no signs however of changing their fundamental beliefs and values. Reaching out to dissidents, to the ruling party, is part of their attempt to tweak the system and better package their policies.

    We want a vibrant democracy where there are real choices and where no political party has the sort of monolithic control that the current ruling party has over Spore. Can we have have a different ruling party which will do away with sacred cows like the GRC and 2 year NS (or maybe reduce to it to 1 year). The current ruling party will have none of this because they have equated their continual and complete hold on power in Spore with the best interests of their nation. Hence their need to control the unions and the mass media etc…Will reaching out to the populace result in them handing over the unions and the mass media to democratic processes. I think not. They have not shown any sign of doing this. Hence, I dont really see the value in their attempts at reaching out to those who don think like them.

    Maybe they is a “Gorbachev” in the rulilng party who is waiting for the right time to take over the reins of power within the party and who will usher in our “Glasnost”. We shall see.

What say you?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s